A3 metal headgasket vs. copper

[camron at worldaccessnet.com (Camron D. Crouse)]

Camron D. Crouse wrote:

>
>> On Apr 3, 2005 12:29 PM, Camron D. Crouse <camron@worldaccessnet.com> 
>> wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> A3 metal headgasket vs. aftermarket copper headgasket
>>> <http://headgasket.com/> ...
>>>
>>> Which is "better"?
>>>
>>> I've been running an oily, yucky, leaky (not blown) headgasket for as
>>> long as I've had the car, and I'd like to upgrade when I do the head.
>>>
>>> Application: 2.0 16V, stage 1 head, non-boost (for the foreseeable
>>> future).  So if the A3 gasket lowers compression, that would not be
>>> ideal... I've just won an ebay auction on a good condition stock 2.0
>>> head (item 7964624022) which is not yet P&Ped, but I do not plan to 
>>> have
>>> it "decked" unless necessary.
>>>
>>> - Camron from Vancouver, WA USA
>>>   '86.5 Black 16V 2.0L Scirocco
>>>
>>>   
>>
>> Tim McConnell wrote:
>>
>> I thought you were talking about the 2.0 16V FSI Turbo Audi A3 
>> headgasket!
>>  
>>
>
>
> A3 (VW) metal headgasket... ;)
>
> - Camron from Vancouver, WA USA
>   '86.5 Black 16V 2.0L
>

Hey, I sent this to Scirocco list not VWC!

- Camron!