[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[VWC] A3 metal headgasket vs. copper
I thought you were talking about the 2.0 16V FSI Turbo Audi A3 headgasket!
On Apr 3, 2005 12:29 PM, Camron D. Crouse <camron@worldaccessnet.com> wrote:
> A3 metal headgasket vs. aftermarket copper headgasket
> <http://headgasket.com/> ...
>
> Which is "better"?
>
> I've been running an oily, yucky, leaky (not blown) headgasket for as
> long as I've had the car, and I'd like to upgrade when I do the head.
>
> Application: 2.0 16V, stage 1 head, non-boost (for the foreseeable
> future). So if the A3 gasket lowers compression, that would not be
> ideal... I've just won an ebay auction on a good condition stock 2.0
> head (item 7964624022) which is not yet P&Ped, but I do not plan to have
> it "decked" unless necessary.
>
> - Camron from Vancouver, WA USA
> '86.5 Black 16V 2.0L Scirocco
>
> _______________________________________________
> VWC mailing list
> VWC@vintagewatercooleds.com
> http://www.vintagewatercooleds.com/mailman/listinfo/vwc
>
--
www.vintagewatercooleds.com/tech