[VWC] A3 metal headgasket vs. copper

[camron at worldaccessnet.com (Camron D. Crouse)]

>On Apr 3, 2005 12:29 PM, Camron D. Crouse <camron@worldaccessnet.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>A3 metal headgasket vs. aftermarket copper headgasket
>><http://headgasket.com/> ...
>>
>>Which is "better"?
>>
>>I've been running an oily, yucky, leaky (not blown) headgasket for as
>>long as I've had the car, and I'd like to upgrade when I do the head.
>>
>>Application: 2.0 16V, stage 1 head, non-boost (for the foreseeable
>>future).  So if the A3 gasket lowers compression, that would not be
>>ideal... I've just won an ebay auction on a good condition stock 2.0
>>head (item 7964624022) which is not yet P&Ped, but I do not plan to have
>>it "decked" unless necessary.
>>
>>- Camron from Vancouver, WA USA
>>   '86.5 Black 16V 2.0L Scirocco
>>
>>    
>>
> Tim McConnell wrote:
>
>I thought you were talking about the 2.0 16V FSI Turbo Audi A3 headgasket!
>  
>


A3 (VW) metal headgasket... ;)

- Camron from Vancouver, WA USA
   '86.5 Black 16V 2.0L