How we can help out Rich...(UPDATE)

[flaatr at yahoo.com (Euroroc II)]

The consent does not necessarily need to be in writing... they can, on 
tape, state that the conversation is being recorded and ask you to reply 
with a yes or no if you agree to it. If you say no they should stop 
recording but  if you answer yes then it's legal to continue. If your 
answer was no then they may refuse to continue the conversation and require 
all policy changes to be made in writing.

My $0.02
-Raffi


At 07:34 AM 6/9/2004, Drew wrote:
>On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 10:23, Rich Deede wrote:
> > they claim to be getting the taped phone conversation to prove it.
>
>According to this web site (http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.recordlaw.html)
>some states require both parties to consent to the phone conversation
>being recorded.  Did you sign a waiver allowing them to record any and
>all conversations with them?  Or are you in one of those one-party
>consent states?
>
>Drew
>
>
>84 Wolfsburg Ed. Scirocco GTD http://scirocco.cs.uoguelph.ca/gtd
>89 Audi 200 Turbo Quattro Avant
>94 A3 Golf GL TurboDiesel, 99 A3 Jetta GL TDI
>=========================================================================
>At the time this email was written there were only
>11 months, 23 days, 13 hours, and 28 minutes until Cincy2K+5! Have YOU
>packed yet?
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l