[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
1.8L head on 2.0L block
We've covered this before (and before and before and before)... here are
the numbers measured by TT.
-RGK-
>Taken from E/C Jan 1993 article written with Techtonics. All numbers were
>derived from testing on a Superflow SF-300 flow bench.
>
>
> Intake port flow testing on Superflow Flow Flow
> bench at 28-inches
>
>Valve
>lift .100-in .150-in .200-in .250-in
> .300-in .350-in .400-in
>
>1.8 16V
>Head 75.7 107.8 138.2 161.2
>175.3 181.0 183.4
>2.0 16V
>Head 67.7 101.4 130.7 143.3
>163.2 197.9 171.1
>TT Streetport
>16V 75.8 110.9 146.5 175.0
>190.6 199.1 209.4
>
>
>
> Exhaust port flow testing on Superflow Flow Flow
> bench at 28-inches
>
>Valve
>lift .100-in .150-in .200-in .250-in
> .300-in .350-in .400-in
>
>1.8 16V
>Head 67.4 96.1 114.9 121.1
>124.2 125.2 126.3
>2.0 16V
>Head 60.9 91.1 115.9 129.3
>136.5 138.3 140.8
>TT Streetport
>16V 66.8 99.2 125.4 138.7
>152.3 160.2 165.6
At 06:57 PM 6/26/2003 -0400, Scott F. Williams wrote:
>Mr. DeLong wrote:
> > Uninformed people *think* the 1.8l head flows more air
> > than the 2.0l head. Although, I have flow sheets here somewhere
> > that depict a regular 1.8l head flows 14% less air than a 2.0l head.
>
>Chris, the 1.8l 16v head is reportedly higher-flowing on the intake side
>whereas the 2.0l 16v is supposed to be better with the exhaust. What exactly
>are *you* claiming? Are you comparing intake or exhaust or somehow combining
>the two? If it is the latter, how are you doing it -averaging the numbers
>for both?
>--
>Scott F. Williams
>NJ Scirocco nut
>'99 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS
>Mazda 323 GTX turbo "assaulted" vehicle
>Golf GTI 16v "rollycar"
>ClubVAC: "Roads found. Drivers wanted."
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l