1.8L head on 2.0L block

[green536 at hotmail.com (Chris DeLong)]

Yes, averaging numbers compared between intake and xhaust flow. Not to 
mention that when polishing and porting the head you have more material to 
work with on the intake side of a 2.0l head and by nature the exhaust ports 
are larger. So basically this gives an all around better solution to the 
whole head issue.



Chris DeLong
Fine Tuning
206.367.5503
www.finetuningperformance.com
Seattle, WA USA





>From: "Scott F. Williams" <sfwilliams@comcast.net>
>To: Chris DeLong <green536@hotmail.com>, marquez337@yahoo.com, 
>scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>Subject: RE: 1.8L head on 2.0L block
>Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:57:13 -0400
>
>Mr. DeLong wrote:
> > Uninformed people *think* the 1.8l head flows more air
> > than the 2.0l head. Although, I have flow sheets here somewhere
> > that depict a regular 1.8l head flows 14% less air than a 2.0l head.
>
>Chris, the 1.8l 16v head is reportedly higher-flowing on the intake side
>whereas the 2.0l 16v is supposed to be better with the exhaust. What 
>exactly
>are *you* claiming? Are you comparing intake or exhaust or somehow 
>combining
>the two? If it is the latter, how are you doing it -averaging the numbers
>for both?
>--
>Scott F. Williams
>NJ Scirocco nut
>'99 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS
>Mazda 323 GTX turbo "assaulted" vehicle
>Golf GTI 16v "rollycar"
>ClubVAC: "Roads found. Drivers wanted."
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail