[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
Subject
: 4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From
: brett at ataxxia.com (Brett Van Sprewenburg)
Date
: Thu Nov 2 08:44:23 2006
In-reply-to
: <
4e43374f75873dfb9f067e5c78761125@scirocco.cs.uoguelph.ca
>
References
: <
000601c6fe14$3e047b80$6401a8c0@kellnerhmypj1x
> <
41691.192.80.68.68.1162429796.squirrel@www.validpath.com
> <
652C5371-7DD8-4FE0-9DE2-4C874FEAF5F4@ataxxia.com
> <
4e43374f75873dfb9f067e5c78761125@scirocco.cs.uoguelph.ca
>
Arrg, shift point....just past your torque peak is better, not before. duh, sorry. ==Brett
Follow-Ups
:
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From:
brett at ataxxia.com (Brett Van Sprewenburg)
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From:
jdbubb at verizon.net (Dan Bubb)
References
:
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From:
rfkellner at snet.net (Rick Kellner)
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From:
area53 at validpath.com (Jeff Toomasson)
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From:
brett at ataxxia.com (Brett Van Sprewenburg)
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
From:
roccit_53 at scirocco.cs.uoguelph.ca (C Boyko)
Prev by Date:
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
Next by Date:
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
Previous by thread:
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
Next by thread:
4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?
Index(es):
Date
Thread