[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Diesel crank in a 16v???



Dan,

    Thanks for taking me to school on this.  Maybe there is a chance this
engine was rebuilt not too many miles ago and is just still tight.  I dunno.
I've checked the wiring pretty good, it's all larger then stock wiring and
all the connections seem nice and tight, not to mention free of any
corrosion.  I dunno, maybe the starter I put in is a bit flakey.  I'm sure
I'll figure it out.

    I do appreciate the info though, good to know that someone
didn't/couldn't just dump a diesel crank in it and make me continue to
scratch my head.  I'm sure whatever the issue is, I looked right at it and
didn't see it.  Back to square one it is.

William S


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Bubb" <jdbubb@verizon.net>
To: "Calimus" <calimus@techography.net>
Cc: <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Diesel crank in a 16v???


A 2.0L 16V has a very noticeable increase in mid range torque over a 1.8L.
If you had one of each there would never be any doubt which one you were
driving. So, it's probably not a 2.1L if it feels about the same as a 1.8L.
ETKA indicates the crank bearing shells are the same between gas and diesel
engines, so the crank will drop into the block. Course that doesn't mean the
connecting rod won't hit the side of the block!
Just to keep stirring the pot on this, you cannot simply swap longer stroke
cranks into an engine without also changing either the rods or pistons, and
it's almost always the piston. Aftermarket pistons are designed to a
specific CR that takes into account the difference in displacement. So,
basically, even if the engine had a diesel crank, the CR isn't necessarily
any higher than stock.
Sorry, I can't help on the starter motor issue.
Dan

From: "C Boyko" <roccit_53@scirocco.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:23 PM

> On 9:07:14 am 01/31/06 "Calimus" <calimus@techography.net> wrote:
>> Is there a chance that someone would and could put a diesel crank in
>> a 16v (1.8 flavor)?  If so, the block would have to be line-bored
>> correct?  An rather then the crank bearing being .20 they might need
>> to be about .25?
>> I'm asking because the rocco the wife picked up had a diesel starter
>> in it that died over the course of the day.  No biggie, I replaced it
>> with a standard sarter that I had layin around.  However, it seems
>> the the starter (which was in perfect working order when I removed it
>> from a car) seems to have trouble turning the engine the first few
>> revolutions.  It doesn't seem like a power (electricity) issue as the
>> cables to ground and to the starter are about 4 guage.  Not as beefy
>> as I normally go, but pretty damn close. The battery is only 4 months
>> old and has more then enough CCA's.
>> So I wondered that if maybe someone tossed a diesel crank in the car
>> at some point, which boosted the compression (i'm guessing around
>> 11.0:1) so they added the diesel starter to help compensate.?
>>
>> Is this possible?  An if so, why might they have done it.  The cars
>> power feels pretty good, but it's nothing major over my worn out 16v
>> rocco with bad motor mounts, cracked exhaust and 300k miles.
>>
>> Anyway, just curious if I could be onto something or if I'm smoking
>> crack.
>> William S.
>>
> I dunno about the crank, but often wiring can make it seem slow the first
> few times over, sometiumes the smaller wires to the starter or coil get
> jarred loose and behave like that, and check the security of that tranny
> ground too. And maybe I'm on crack too..
> Cathy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 1/27/2006




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 1/27/2006