[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Twin charger project?
- Subject: Twin charger project?
- From: corylang at dccnet.com (Cory Langford)
- Date: Mon Feb 2 18:02:52 2004
- In-reply-to: <012301c3e761$73ca2f20$ce654644@DJB75P31>
- References: <3.0.1.32.20040129164748.00722764@pop3.dccnet.com>
Agreed, that in this day and age you can produce either a turbo or a
supercharged system that will mean almost any need. The only real factor
becomes $$$.
So being the cheap-ass I am, and simply liking project that are unique in
design. I figure I could throw together something relatively cheap that
would give good off the line torque & boost while at the same time have the
top end power most turbos are known for.
I wouldn't really consider it a daily driver until it has been proven
though :)
It is one of those project done simply for the act of doing it...
Cory
At 11:47 AM 01/30/2004 -0700, gregdunn wrote:
>> Take the supercharged g60 engine and ADD a turbo system to it (instead of
>> replace the charger with a turbo as most people do).
>
>
>You have a whole lot of potential for problems - "what is the goal?" would
>be my first question. If you want 400 hp or something for dragging, or a
>killer daily driver, etc etc. that can all be handled a number of routes,
>but double-supercharging an engine adds weight and complexity where it
>doesn't need to be. I don't want to kill your idea, but there are so many
>good turbo setups (various trims & hybrids) that it doesn't make much sense.
>Hell, the variable vane Triumph Speed Triple I rode a while back was 955cc.
>It made 180 hp. And you could ride it like a grandma no problem.
>
>I would think it would be too much work and probably fall short of a clean,
>well designed turbo setup, or even a good centrifugal supercharger setup.
>
>gd
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>