[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Megasquirt: sensor files
- Subject: Megasquirt: sensor files
- From: vwtype53 at yahoo.com (Ben Harder)
- Date: Sun Feb 1 09:36:11 2004
- In-reply-to: <009b01c3e832$3c55a340$7e6df7a5@home>
Dan,
Thanks for the explaination... I now completely understand what you
are saying.
I remember a while ago I was messing around
with making one of those "16v fuel enrichment modules" that don't
really work... anyhow, I do recall consulting a resistance vs. temp
chart in the 16v Bentley manual. This chart may be what we need
for accurate inputs to MS. Yes?
And Dan, my mk2 16v has found a new home with fellow lister Don Walter.
I look forward to seeing the car again hopefully at Cincy this year...
can't wait to see its progress.
Ben
--- Dan Bubb <jdbubb@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I wasn't clear.
> It's not that the VW sensors are not accurate enough. The problem is
> accurately determining the
> resistance at various temperatures to input the data into Megasquirt.
> I did boiling water, freezing water and room temp with the sensor sitting
> over a heat register
> blowing ambient air. i.e. heater and AC not on.
> Despite trying to be as accurate as possible the resistance varied quite a
> bit during these
> measurements. With the sensors installed and MS running the engine temp
> normally maxed out at 180
> degs which I think is probably low. So, that is the basis of my statement.
> Maybe somebody else can do a better job of measuring the resistance than I
> did.
> All of this really only applies to the coolant sensor anyway since the 16V
> has no air temp sensor.
> And if you think about it the accuracy of the coolant temp sensor isn't very
> important. It isn't
> used for mixture control unless you're cold running and then you can put in
> any % in the warm up
> bins that your engine needs.
> So, now having thought about it using the stock sensor is adequate for
> coolant.
> OTOH, a sensor needs to be added for air temp so you might as well use the GM
> since MS is already
> calibrated for it and it is a low thermal mass sensor. (which could be
> important for a turbo engine
> and much less so for an NA engine)
>
> So, Ben! What happened to your MK II 16V?
>
> Dan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Benjamin Harder" <vwtype53@yahoo.com>
> To: <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Megasquirt: sensor files
>
>
> >
> > --- Brian McGarvey <brianm@earendel.org> wrote:
> > > Has anybody done the VW sensors? Or do I have to do them or get the GM
> > > ones from the junkyard.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, so if Dan says the VW sensors aren't accurate enough, then
> > would the best option be to get GM sensors? Obviously the GM sensors
> > require no mods to use with the MS... so the real challenge is how
> > to actually USE the GM sensors? How do you fit a GM coolant temp
> > sensor into the head of a VW 16v? Make a custom adapter?
> > I'll be doing this soon enough too... so what might the *BEST*
> > solution be here?
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Benjamin Harder
> > 1980 Scirocco 2.0 16v
> > 1993 Passat GLX
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/vwtype53/
> >
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/