[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
balancing.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scirocco-l-bounces@scirocco.org [mailto:scirocco-l-
> bounces@scirocco.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Bureau
> 1. alot easier to rach 7K on the rpm in 1st gear and it gets there
FAST!
> 2. alittle lost of MPG indeed, I used to get 32-34MPG before I get 30-
> 32MPG
You more than likely have slightly less fuel mileage because you're
USING the extra acceleration that a lightened flywheel provides.
There's no free ride here - usually if you gain some horsepower from a
modification, you're going to USE that extra power - which in turn burns
more fuel... I don't buy the argument that fuel mileage decreases with
a lightened flywheel simply because there's less rotational inertia. If
anything, it takes more power to get a heavier flywheel spinning in the
first place, so I believe that fuel mileage would be worse (albeit an
almost immeasurable amount) with a heavy flywheel.
Mark.
80 S
81 S ABA/JH/4K
- Follow-Ups:
- balancing.
- From: mr.utility at highstream.net (mr.utility@highstream.net)
- balancing.
- From: marc_scirocco at sympatico.ca (marc_scirocco Quebec)
- balancing.
- From: txrocco at sbcglobal.net (Patrick Bureau)
- References:
- balancing.
- From: txrocco at sbcglobal.net (Patrick Bureau)