Master Cylinder question

[pbureau@attbi.com (ATS - Patrick Bureau)]

Ahhh.. okay

So your saying on a 16v (10.1/8.9 setup) it sems 17mm stoke front and 15mm
back (more brakes in front applied.
and the G60 (11"/8.9) applies 16mmfront and 18mm back ?

Interesting to note that on the bigger front breaks the G60 actually has a
smaller stroke in the front  than the rear (the reverse of the 16v if your
paying attention)

Anyone care to explain why??

Patrick

=>-----Original Message-----
=>From: scirocco-l-admin@scirocco.org
=>[mailto:scirocco-l-admin@scirocco.org]On Behalf Of Allyn
=>Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:14 AM
=>To: dan@angband.org; scirocco-l@scirocco.org
=>Subject: Re: Master Cylinder question
=>
=>
=>ok, that makes much more sense now.
=>Al
=>
=>----- Original Message -----
=>From: <dan@angband.org>
=>To: <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
=>Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:13 PM
=>Subject: Re: Master Cylinder question
=>
=>
=>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:02:53PM -0600, ATS - Patrick Bureau wrote:
=>> > AL,
=>> >
=>> > 16v Rocco MC 22,2mm Stroke, 17/15 Bore
=>> > G60 noABS MC 22,2mm Stroke, 16/18 Bore
=>> >
=>> > 16v MC Bore = 17/15 = 1.13
=>> > G60 MC Bore = 16/18 = 0.89
=>> >
=>> > See.. same stoke, smaller bore = more pressure to brake pad
=>than 16v MC.
=>>
=>> Um.... NO!  They are both 22mm bore.  17/15 is NOT a fraction, it is the
=>> stroke of the forward chamber and the aft chamber of the MC..
=>17mm stroke
=>> front, 15mm rear.
=>>
=>> Dan
=>>
=>>
=>> --
=>> 37% of your base are belong to IRS.
=>> Take off every deduction for great justice!
=>>
=>> _______________________________________________
=>> Scirocco-l mailing list
=>> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
=>> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
=>
=>
=>_______________________________________________
=>Scirocco-l mailing list
=>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
=>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l