2.0L 16v Implant

[lauri.pettai@netexpress.ee (Lauri Pettai)]

I also did this 2.0 16v with 1.8 head conversion and to get the time to
build the engine I did a little swap and put on 1.8 engine with 2.0l head.
So I could work with the 2.0 bottom end and 1.8 head for a while. Well,
the 1.8 bottom and 2.0 head combo is a really nice combination for daily
driver. It has enourmos bottom end power and nice cruising power, but
as soon as you push it to the limits it dies best acceleration was
accomplished by changing gears at 5000rpm. Put I had time to mach the
2.0 litre bottom 1.8 litre head perfectly.

Lauri!
'84 2.0 16v Scirocco GTX Kamei X1 Bodykit (VIN025736)
http://www.eabc.edu.ee/~laurts/scirocco
I finally added nothing new to my site!


> Shannon Fenton's site gives a good picture showing the differences in ports 
> between the heads.  It is something like www.scirocc16v.com  Look in the 
> tech section under his port&polish job.  Nice site, BTW.  He makes a pretty 
> good case for being able to work a 2.0l to be better than a 1.8, but the 
> conventional wisdom is that in stock form (like that matters!) the 1.8 head 
> flows better.  I have no personal experience, but I'd go with the 2.0l head 
> so you can get the whole engine built without disturbing your car.