need rocco weight numbers

[skerocdriver@juno.com (Shawn C Meze)]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:59:03 -0400 STENDEC <dan@angband.org> writes:
>On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:33:27PM -0400, Shawn C Meze wrote:

>Doesn't the 82 have a full-size spare, and the 84 have a mini spare?


Yes but when I weighed both cars, it was in full autox setup meaning, no
nadda in the car. 


>That could account for a few pounds...  Also, didn't early MKII cars 
>have bumpers which included hydraulic shock absorbtion?


True but, the 82 has euro bumpers and the 84 has US bumpers. Doesnt add
up. 


>Your 82 have any equipment the '84 doesn't?  AC, PS, etc?
>all I can think of...


Nope, No A/C, P/S, P/B, both have P/W. 

The 82 SHOULD be lighter. The 84 has 2 X 12's and a 300w amp and the rest
of the stereo system. I just removed the header from the 82' and put it
on the 84'. The stock manifold/downpipe weighs alot more than the header
does so now the 84 will be even lighter. They're both basically identical
cars except for a few minor things that shouldnt be weight related. Its
just not right. 


Shawn Méze
86' Jetta GLi 8V   88' Corvette -SS 30- 2001 SDR Solo2 Champion
82' Scirocco GTi -FSP 54-   79' "Project FSP Scirocco"  84' Scirocco 8V
The Fastest, Quickest, Cleanest and best looking Scirocco(s) in all of
San Diego!
http://www.Geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/1308/index.htm


________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.