Re: Catatonic Perverters

[Gary Huff <scirocco86@home.com>]

Agreed, I don't feel like catching any fines from the EPA. I have a hollowed out stock downpipe for my 16v car when emissions time comes. Catalytic pervertors also do more harm than good. A lot of what they convert the "bad" stuff into, is really just as bad if not worse for the environment. Burning fossil fuel is simply a no win situation.
	-ghuff

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:19:47AM -0700, Matthew Yip wrote:
> It's not so much the environmentally friendly approach that keeps
> catatonic perverters on my cars, it's the $10,000 EPA fine when they
> find it's missing.
> 
> BTW, does anyone know if a particle trap on a diesel is covered under
> the same auspices as a catatonic perverter on a gasoline powered
> vehicle?  
> 
> --- Dan Bubb <jdbubb@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Who gives a good Goddamned about downpipes without cats? The cats
> > cost
> > little in power for street use so being environmentally friendly is
> > a damn
> > small price.
> 
> 
> =====
> Matthew
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
> 
> --
> Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
> To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org
> 

--
Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org