[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.

To: jason@scirocco.org, scirocco-l@scirocco.org
Subject: Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.
From: UrGTI@aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 14:39:11 EDT
Sender: owner-scirocco-l@scirocco.org

I can have a guy scan it and send it when I see him next, probably on the 
weekend.

The problem is the guy running the dyno only started my chart at 4000 and ran 
it up to 7000. At 4000 I had 130 lbs and 99 HP from there the torque drops 
slowly and the HP raises.
Not the best chart but you can learn a little I suppose.

Jasin

--
Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.
  - From: josh Wyte <josh_wyte@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.
Next by Date: Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.
Prev by thread: Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.
Next by thread: Re: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread