Re: was 2.0 16v/ any with motronic

[jonas miller <sjmill@erols.com>]

i am doingthis swap, and i know one or two others have...it is a better
advantage to have the Motronic system for its programablitlity..as for
performance and tuning that is part of the programing   ....the CIS E 
is good for economy so if you are going all out or want to have that
option i woudl use it ...

you need to use the other fuel lines and airbox, cause of the length  of
the lines, unless you are going to cut the exsisting lines adn reattah
the injectors.....

jonas

Anthony Pelletier wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I was wondering if there was anyone on the list with
> motronic installed with the injection on the drivers
> side(like it is stock.)  I was just curious cause I am
> debating the swap and wouldn't want to switch sides.
> 
> Tony
> 
> --- Gary Huff <ghuff@htech.com> wrote:
> > It all depends on how much work you want to do. You
> > could swap in a 2.0l 16v
> > tallblock and retain standard CIS-E. And the 2.0l
> > 16v's came with CIS-E
> > motronic, which I believe there is a way to wire it
> > in without moving the
> > injection, but I don't know if that would have
> > adverse affects. I am still
> > trying to get the guy that did it to talk!
> >
> > I am doing my swap the simple way. I am having a
> > complete 2.0l 16v longblock
> > rebuilt with porting polishing etc, or if I can't
> > find a complete longblock
> > at a decent price, I will pickup a 1.8l 16v head to
> > have rebuilt along with
> > a 2.0l shortblock so I can still drive my car.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benjamin Harder [mailto:vwtype53@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 5:01 PM
> > To: Scirocco List
> > Subject: 2.0 16v opinions
> >
> >
> > There have been quite a few posts lately about doing
> > the 2.0 liter 16v.  I
> > have heard so many different thoughts and different
> > possibilities for this
> > swap that I was hoping to get a general opinion on
> > what would be the best.
> > I have a 1.8 16v rocco (cis-e) that I would love to
> > upgrade to a 2.0
> >
> > I've heard of getting a 2.0 bottom end and keeping
> > the 1.8 head...this is
> > so I could maintain the cis-e injection, right?
> > The other option is to swap engines (get a 2.0 tall
> > block?)...this would
> > require changing over to motronic injection?
> >
> > I just wondered what the *best* way to do this would
> > be...
> > Are there big advantages either way (is motronic
> > better than cis-e?)
> >
> > Just trying to clear up some confusion...at least
> > with me!
> >
> > TIA
> >
> >
> > =====
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > Benjamin Harder
> > 86 Scirocco 16v
> > 81 Scirocco (now with a 1.8 JH!)
> > http://members.xoom.com/Scirocco16v/
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> >
> > --
> > Email problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org  To
> > unsubscibe send
> > "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to
> > majordomo@scirocco.org
> >
> > --
> > Email problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org  To
> > unsubscibe send
> > "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to
> > majordomo@scirocco.org
> >
> >
> 
> =====
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> Email problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org  To unsubscibe send
> "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org

--
Email problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org  To unsubscibe send
"unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org