[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Supercharged vs. Turbo
- Subject: Re: Supercharged vs. Turbo
- From: "Ryan Schuermann" <rts@nol.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 20:55:09 +0000
actually...as long as you regularly replace the seals (just like a
16v timing belt) and upgrade to the dual cog belt (or at leastchange
it even more frequently) the G60 is a fine piece of equipment.
Usually you hear them going back because of improper maintenence or
lack there of. Now I know modern ones are virtually trouble free and
I think eatons are good for almost a lifetime being sealed and all,
but for the cost of a G60 and the availability of EXACT plumbing
parts, it makes for a healthy choice.
personally i wouldn't use it unless i upgraded it to a TEC dual cog
belt. but it is good for an easy +70hp.
Ryan
> > being available? I'm also concerned about the longevity factor of a
> turbo.
> > Superchargers seem to be more reliable, which is why VW chose to put a
> > G-lader on the Corrado instead of a turbo (which they did experiment
> > with)...
> >
> > -tim
>
> The G60 being reliable, ha ha. Thats funny. thats just my uneducated voice
> speaking, but from what i've heard, i've yet to hear a good thing about the
> reliability of the G60.
>
> sorry i had nothing usefull to contribute to the thread :)
>
>
> Owen
> 87 16v
> http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Garage/1571
> --
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, send email to scirocco-L-request@scirocco.org,
> with your request (subscribe, unsubscribe) in the BODY of the message.
>
>
- --
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send email to scirocco-L-request@scirocco.org,
with your request (subscribe, unsubscribe) in the BODY of the message.
------------------------------