[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
16v w/ turbo
Ok sounds good. 8-)
How about wanting to push about 20-25psi. what would be a good compression
to yield decent off boost and still be ok with boost?
1st I went with 9A
Then 3A
Then ABA
Now I'm back to leaning toward 9A
8-)
Anthony who lerks on the list had a nice looking black rocc turbo he sold
about a year or so ago on vortex. Wish I could find the pic's from the
thread. It was sweet. It all under the hood looked like it belongs there.
Chuck has a nice MKI he's running an ABA. I'm not sure what he pushes on
boost, but it looks real nice and everyone that has taken rides in it says
it NICE. 8-)
I like the fact he kept the A/C also.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Smith" <smithma7@gmail.com>
To: "car" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 10:51 PM
Subject: 16v w/ turbo
> With all this talk of 16v heads and blocks and 8v varieties of both in
> 3 or 4 different threads, I'm getting a little confused trying to
> follow it all.
>
> Given:
>
> 1) I like 16v engines
> 2) I really like the turbo on Bib
> 3) I like the idea of Megasquirt (as well as Spark)
> 4) I like thinking about bringing all 3 together somehow but am clueless
> :).
>
> Given the above, what would be the optimum set-up for a 16v turbo
> application in Red? (Is that a vague enough question?) As far as
> type of performance: I'm not looking to really race it or anything;
> just decent street performance while still being able to tickle to
> butt dyno and wow passengers.
>
>
> --
> Mike
> '86 red 16v: Red 5 (aka der Jahrtausendfeierfalke)
> '05 Indigo Blue GTI 1.8T: Bib
> "The world is my oyster soup kitchen floor wax museum." - King Crimson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/1/2007
> 2:50 PM
>
>