[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
warning: now OT political (was "Bridge Collapse")
A little history... for ya here. Although it's a .mil site so it may
be a little biased.
http://www.mediacen.navy.mil/pubs/allhands/feb99/febpg20.htm
It explains partially why the US is there. Don't worry my friend...
No troops. I worry about your environment though. My understanding
is processing the tar sand is less than friendly to the environment.
I hope greedy people aren't destroying the land to make a quick buck.
On 8/8/07, Jean-Claude D?sinor <desinor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris Bennett wrote:
> > All of
> > us by membership to this list feeds the fire so to speak with our love
> > of cars that are dependent on foriegn oil.
> My car only depends on "foreign" oil because my domestic oil is
> diverted to the US.
> My biggest worry is your next sentences:
>
> > Dependence on foriegn oil
> > means that we have to protect the tankers and our "business"
> > associates in Saudi Arabia. Break the dependence on Oil and the US
> > wouldn't have troops and ships in that area. We (the western
> > civilzation) have painted ourselves into a corner.
> Troops and ships to protect your dependency on oil! Scares me because
> we have oil here ...
> We do not believe we need that much protection, thank you! You want
> oil? Just give us money and we will be happy.
> Oh, you do not want oil anymore? We have electricity too! Hydro
> electricity to cool you down in the summer.
> No troops please :-)
>
> Jean-Claude
> 84 8v (more frugal than any SUV)
>
--
80 Scirocco Callaway Indiana Red
87 Scirocco 16v Tornado Red
04 R32 Reflex Silver