4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?

[lord_verminaard at yahoo.com (Brendan Doyle)]

I really enjoy the 4k in my 8v.  I think anything less would really be a
little boring.  :)  On a higher powered, higher revving 2.0 16v I can see
how it might be a little cumbersome- as my 8v is a "little more than
stock" 1-2-3 go by quite quickly and I could not imagine how quick it
would be on a 2l 16v- not even mentioning traction issues.  ;)

Brendan
84 Scirocco 8v
00 Camaro L36 M49


--- Ron Pieper <rapieper@yahoo.com> wrote:

> IMO, you rip through the gears so fast with the 4K that it may prove to
> be slower than a 2Y...no
> data to support that - but man, you'd do a lot of shifting.
> 
> Ron
> 
> --- Rick Kellner <rfkellner@snet.net> wrote:
> 
> > Ron, thanks for the reply.  Any particulars why you prefer the 2.0l,
> 2Y
> > combination over the 4K?  Does the HP and torque match better with the
> > slightly longer 2Y (again, first through fifth, I plan on a .75
> fifth)?
> > Thanks, Rick.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
__________________________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get
> things done faster. 
> (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta) 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Low, Low, Low Rates! Check out Yahoo! Messenger's cheap PC-to-Phone call rates 
(http://voice.yahoo.com)