4K vs. 2Y, not much difference?

[rapieper at yahoo.com (Ron Pieper)]

>From my experience, yes there will be a noticeable difference caused by the final drive ratios. 
The 4K is definitely more "sporty" but this can be irritating in daily driving situations.  For a
2.0L, I'd prefer the 2Y.

Ron

--- Rick Kellner <rfkellner@snet.net> wrote:

> I used Ron's excel sheet and data to graph the 4K vs. the 2Y in first
> through fourth gears from 2000 rpm to 7000 rpm.  Since the only
> difference between these two transaxles (other than fifth) is the ring
> and pinion ratio.  This results in the lines being very similar.  As an
> example, at 6000 rpm in first there is only 2 MPH difference and by the
> time you are in fourth, at 6k, there is only a 7 mph difference.
> Now the question, the data does not show a dramatic difference between
> the two transaxles however; is there a real difference on the road and
> in particular with a 2.0l 16V motor.
> Any input would be appreciated.  Thanks, Rick.
> 
> As far as other differences, I do realize that the 2Y does have 100mm
> axles and the drive shaft on 4th gear is stronger.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> 





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the New Yahoo.com 
(http://www.yahoo.com/preview)