[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[way ot] superbowl
- Subject: [way ot] superbowl
- From: dcblues at hotmail.com (Doug Conyers)
- Date: Thu Feb 5 06:27:38 2004
I dont think it is the boob everyone is upset about. I think it was the way
it happened. Clothing being pulled so it came into view. I believe it
would been totally different if her boob popped out by itself.
-Doug
>From: "T. Reed" <treed2@wsu.edu>
>To: miT <mit@lunartransmission.com>
>CC: "'Scirocco-L@Scirocco.Org'" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>, 'Dave Ewing'
><MK1Scirocco16v@comcast.net>
>Subject: RE: [way ot] superbowl
>Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:57:29 -0800 (PST)
>
>Amen. It's amazing to me how people consider nudity so "harmful" to
>children. Kids don't know the difference until we force our screwed
>up value system onto them. Nudity != Sex, and even if it was, I still
>question the argument that it is harmful in any way. It's the people
>layering shame upon it that are doing the harm.
>
>-Toby
>
>On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, miT wrote:
>
> > Morals shmorals, you know how badly Europe is laughing at us? They
>consider
> > the nude body a work of art. I think that we should do the same and just
>get
> > over it, IT’S A FREAKING BOOB, GOD FORBID!
> >
> > Happily moving on,
> >
> >
> > /miT
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
_________________________________________________________________
High-speed users—be more efficient online with the new MSN Premium Internet
Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1