Lightened Flywheel -2.0l 16v

[fahrvegnugen at cox.net (David Utley)]

> 
> From: "Dan Bubb" <jdbubb@ix.netcom.com>
> Date: 2004/08/30 Mon PM 01:33:43 EDT
> To: <fahrvegnugen@cox.net>,  "Dan Smith" <sad_rocc@yahoo.com>, 
>         "The Scirocco List" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> Subject: Re: Re: Lightened Flywheel -2.0l 16v
> 
> 
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Lightened Flywheel -2.0l 16v
> 
> 
> >
> > >
> > > From: Dan Smith <sad_rocc@yahoo.com>
> > > Date: 2004/08/30 Mon AM 10:14:24 EDT
> > > To: The Scirocco List <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> > > Subject: Re: Lightened Flywheel -2.0l 16v
> > >
> > > Does anyone use a lightened flywheel in a turbo car? I was going to but was told that that would
> be a very bad idea, as it would be hard to stay in the turbo's range on shifts and 1st and 2nd would
> be pretty much useless. Opinions?
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > In that position, I would think you are better off using the stock flywheel...  The HP to the
> > wheels increase will be more than made up with the extra boost...
> > Cheers,
> >   David
> 
> 
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand at all what you're saying. For instance, what extra boost?
> Dan
> 
He is building a turbo car...  It will have more boost than a normally aspirated car...  :-)

David


---Chrome don't get you home.---