[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?

Subject: Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
From: area53 at validpath.com (Jeff Toomasson)
Date: Thu Apr 22 14:50:48 2004
In-reply-to: <20040422184738.40030.qmail@web41210.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20040422184738.40030.qmail@web41210.mail.yahoo.com>

No, never got to. I sold the k-bar with the cabby...

Looks like the AT version is the more popular - now if I can only find one used 
(yeah, right!  :)

Thanks to all - JT

> 
> I'd get the autotech. If you're car is bent even a little (our cars are
> gettin old), it won't line up. Did you try to see if a 16v subframe will
> line up?
> 
> 		
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25?
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l

Follow-Ups:
- Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
  - From: mr.utility at highstream.net (David Utley)
- Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
  - From: flaatr at yahoo.com (Euroroc II)

References:
- Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
  - From: chris24g at yahoo.com (chris gonzalez)

Prev by Date: Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
Next by Date: Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
Previous by thread: Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
Next by thread: Eurosport vs. Autotech subframe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread