4k trans r&p ratio

[derrickmd18 at verizon.net (derrick floyd)]

T. Reed wrote:

>Perfect, thanks Ron!
>
>For some reason I had it in my mind that it was 3.89. But coming from
>3.67, 3.94 is even better :)
>
>"faster acceleration through more aggressive gearing"
>
>*drool*
>
>-Toby
>
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ron Pieper wrote:
>
>  
>
>>--- treed2@wsu.edu wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Everywhere I look I'm finding conflicting information. Does the 4k tranny
>>>have a 3.89 or a 3.94 r&p? Does anybody conclusively know (ie. by counting
>>>gear teeth when they had theirs apart.. duh, I should have done that!)
>>>      
>>>
>>Every one I've ever had apart has had 3.94, verified by counting teeth.
>>
>>HTH
>>
>>Ron
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
>>http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>  
>
I don't think 4K break as much as a 16v tranny does.  I have a 4K in my 
car with 240K miles on it and it hasn't broken yet.