[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Turbo vs. Supercharger.
- Subject: Turbo vs. Supercharger.
- From: bkpros at shaw.ca (BK Pros)
- Date: Tue Jul 1 10:45:14 2003
- References: <20030630190429.78634.qmail@web13204.mail.yahoo.com>
Turbos create more efficient power. Of the energy released in the
combustion chamber 1/3 goes into the cooling system 1/3 goes down the
crankshaft and 1/3 goes out the exhaust. By using the wasted 1/3 of the
combusted energy, (exhaust) you get more effecient power gains. Although
when air is forced through the turbine section of a turbo, reduced-flow
areas inherent in the design create back pressure, causing power loss. The
power loss inherent in a turbo engine is substantially less than the loss
occured by driving a supercharger with a belt or some other means.
In english: A turbo uses free energy to give power, where a supercharger
uses your engines energy to give power thus taking away power as well.
more info in the pages of Maximum Boost by Corky Bell:
hth
Nate
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Smith" <smithma7@yahoo.com>
To: "car" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:04 PM
Subject: Turbo vs. Supercharger.
>
>
> Just wondering why most poeple tend to go for the Turbo as opposed to the
Supercharger. Any opinions?
>
> Mike
>
>
> word (w?rd)
> interj. Slang. Used to express approval or an affirmative response to
something. Sometimes used with up. Source
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l