[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
cups v. coilovers?
- Subject: cups v. coilovers?
- From: abatzis2@hotmail.com (Michael Abatzis)
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 01:00:25 +0000
>From: "Scott F. Williams" <sfwilliams@comcast.net>
>
> > That's weird because I thought the subject was cups v. coilovers?
> > Yep, just looked again and it still is.
> > Dave
>
>Come on now, Dave. You know as well as the next guy that thread topics
>wander. The original question regarded how the Cup kit and coilover
>compares.
i'd still like to know, by the way. seriously i'm sure someone has these
things in their 16v?
>The aftermarket springs might be heavier than the stock springs (dunno
>about
>"better"), however, the front/rear spring rate bias will still be optimized
>for either 8v or 16v.
keep in mind scott, that i wasn't primarily talking about handling bias;
most of my driving is significantly below the limits of the suspension.
also, the bias is affected by plenty of other things besides spring/damper
rates. i still say the 16v springs were upgraded at the factory primarily
for a sportier, stiffer feel. they obviously weren't optimized bias-wise,
since the car still had plenty of understeer.
>--
>Scott F. Williams
>NJ Scirocco nut
>'99 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS
>Mazda 323 GTX turbo "assaulted" vehicle
>Golf GTI 16v "rollycar"
>ClubVAC: "Roads found. Drivers wanted."
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail