[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rear motor mount compairson

Subject: Rear motor mount compairson
From: rocco16v at netzero.net (L F)
Date: Fri Dec 5 05:53:03 2003
References: <BAY9-DAV35Hm9s8jgHR00002688@hotmail.com><Pine.OSF.4.51.0312042122400.303278@cougar.it.wsu.edu><002501c3bb1a$4fd6b200$6401a8c0@sysmainroom>

Jody's right ON with this statement.
After far too much (for my tastes) experimentation with motor mounts, I'd recommend the opposite of your present setup; hard/poly side mounts with stock front and rear units.
But then, I (and my 'Roc) have zero tolerance for vibration.

Larry
old crock and his old 'roc
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: jody 
  To: scirocco-l@scirocco.org 
  Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:26 AM
  Subject: Re: Rear motor mount compairson

  ...one of
  those topics that will never be agreed upon because too much vibration is a
  personal choice i guess and it is all relative anyway...where is the damn
  'vibration dyno' when you need it? ;)  HTH

  jody 'lurking like a madman' bailey

Follow-Ups:
- Rear motor mount compairson
  - From: rapieper at yahoo.com (Ron Pieper)

References:
- Rear motor mount compairson
  - From: astrocowboy5 at hotmail.com (Jonathan Mohan)
- Rear motor mount compairson
  - From: treed2 at wsu.edu (T. Reed)
- Rear motor mount compairson
  - From: steveyk at potak.ca (jody)

Prev by Date: [semi OT] Oh my. I wanna drive this!
Next by Date: [OT] DID YOU REPLY? FW: [OT] Anyone Know of a Source For Jetta DoorRubber?
Previous by thread: Rear motor mount compairson
Next by thread: Rear motor mount compairson
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread