Assemble MegaSquirt

[nealtovsen@yahoo.com (Neal Tovsen)]

So, if you'll allow me to re-phrase your statement,
you're simply more confident of the capabilities of
the Megasquirt because it is a true "standalone"
controller, instead of being a "piggyback"
modifier/controller like the HKS? 

If I'm on the right track, that makes a lot of sense.
I've never been all that thrilled about piggyback
controllers myself, just on principle (but admittedly,
I have very little personal experience with them). In
my case, I feel better to have my Digifant chip
properly re-mapped, rather than "tricking" it into
running right with a piggyback. If I didn't already
have an investment into the Digifant, I might consider
the Megasquirt myself...

Neal

> > Why do you think the Megasquirt would not need
> dyno
> > tuning, but the HKS unit does?
> > *** I did not mean to imply that, and i certainly
> don't think that..
> > the MS does run off the O2 sensor, and other
> engine sensors, and the
> > HKS does not, so once basic settings are entered
> the dynamics
> > adjustments wil follow automatically. The HKS is
> static in this
> > aspect, except the MAP sensor.



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com