Tuning amp/sub/tube (was RE: Re: Speaker opinions...)

[roclist@accessconsulting.ca (Jason Adams)]

Properly designed boxes, i.e. with internal baffels, angled faces, proper
wood etc. shouldn't produce resonances or standing waves.

but we digress....



Jason Adams
Fahrvergnugen Forever! ;)
84 rocco 16v
93 320i
98 Z71

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris DeLong" <green536@hotmail.com>
To: <roclist@accessconsulting.ca>; <joshhignight@techography.net>;
<scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Tuning amp/sub/tube (was RE: Re: Speaker opinions...)


>
> Actually box or tube DOES matter. A box is more likely to produce
resonance
> whereas a tube is less likely. Tubes sound more even across the board (no
> pun intended)if tuned properly
>
>
> Chris DeLong
> ICQ#45030867
> Seattle, WA USA
> '80 16V 'Rocco ragtop
> '91 GLi 2.0 16V
> '77 Rabbit 16V
> '80 'Vert (parting out!)
> '61 17 Window type II
> '91 Vanagon
> '78 Rabbit
> '84 Jetta
>
>
> A
>
> >
> >Box vs tube, doesn't matter, volume is all that matters as is relates to
> >the
> >mass of air that has to be moved by the sub.
> >
> >Go with the 10.5 inch port to begin with. Longer the port the lower the
> >note. in woodwind instraments think clairnet vs bassoon...
> >
> >Jason Adams
> >Fahrvergnugen Forever! ;)
> >84 rocco 16v
> >93 320i
> >98 Z71
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >snip
> > >
> > > Also did some math and came up with ~.9 cu.ft. for volume in the tube
I
> >have. Also that the port size is about 3"x10.5"!!!
> > >
> > > Now, does port length tuning change when thinking about a "box" vs. a
> >tube?
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Scirocco-l mailing list
> >Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> >http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>