[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
1.8 mounting
- Subject: 1.8 mounting
- From: green536@hotmail.com (Chris DeLong)
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 04:48:52 +0000
Actually there is one benefit I can think of off the top of my head to
having a tranverse vs inline setup. The trannies are stronger on the
transverse type setups. They are also more efficient. The power coming from
the engine does not have to turn 90 degrees to make it to the wheels. This
takes its toll on the tranny after years of use. Jsut ask those out there
with dashers and foxes. 90% of those cars on the road have HELLA noisy
trannies. They also break quite often. So that all said it comes to mind
that it might also be more economical to have a transverse setup. Less
powertrain loss = better fuel mileage. less wear on the tranny = less
frequent tranny rebuilds.
>
>The primary reason for transverse mounting is to save space. It's just a
>little more compact....
>Otherwise, there's no benefit, mechanically or financially.
>
>Larry sandiego16V
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Captnbr@aol.com
> To: Scirocco-L@scirocco.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:53 PM
> Subject: 1.8 mounting
>
>
> What can be gained by mounting the 1.8t Longitudinally ie. pistons
>running from front to back, compared to mounting it laterally, left to
>right? My Dad's new Passat has the engine mounted front to back, Isn't it
>more complex, expensive, power robbing to mount it in this way? Compared
>to mounting in left to right like some other VW's have it? Thanks
>
> Brian 86 16v
> 98 Jetta GLX Vr6
Chris DeLong
ICQ#45030867
Seattle, WA USA
'80 16V 'Rocco ragtop
'91 GLi 2.0 16V
'77 Rabbit 16V
'80 'Vert (parting out!)
'61 17 Window type II
'91 Vanagon
'78 Rabbit
'84 Jetta
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com