CIS-E vs. CIS-Motronic

[amalventano1@comcast.net (Allyn)]

both systems in tune on identical engines should run pretty much equal. motronic may have some stuff
done to it to make it more responsive, but that should be the only gain. once you start introducing
hotter cams, other performance mods, motronic can be remapped to take advantage (fuel dumping, etc),
where cis will just keep on doing its job of matching fuel to air.
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason F. Snow" <jason_f_snow@nac.net>
To: "'Dan Bubb'" <jdbubb@ix.netcom.com>; "'Allyn'" <amalventano1@comcast.net>; "'Euroroc II'"
<flaatr@yahoo.com>; <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:21 AM
Subject: RE: CIS-E vs. CIS-Motronic


> Alright what's the HP difference, it's higher with Motronic, and I think
> that was what he was orgionally asking...Gains VS aggravation...?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scirocco-l-admin@scirocco.org
> [mailto:scirocco-l-admin@scirocco.org] On Behalf Of Dan Bubb
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:41 PM
> To: Allyn; Euroroc II; scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> Subject: Re: CIS-E vs. CIS-Motronic
>
> Not to be the dickhead that some think I am, but what about CIS is it
> that
> causes it to "de-tune" after a while????
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Allyn <amalventano1@comcast.net>
> To: Euroroc II <flaatr@yahoo.com>; <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: CIS-E vs. CIS-Motronic
>
>
> > spend the cash on cis-tuning stuff (fuel wise). a properly tuned cis
> setup
> will be nearly as good.
> > the big problem with cis is the fact that it does de-tune after a
> while.
> > Al
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Euroroc II" <flaatr@yahoo.com>
> > To: <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: CIS-E vs. CIS-Motronic
> >
> >
> > > I guess I'm trying to understand what the cost (time&money) vs.
> benefit
> is
> > > between the two systems. If I am not going to see a difference
> between
> it
> > > and CIS-E and it's just a "I'm cool since I'm running a Motronic
> system"
> > > thing then I don't see it being worth the headache.
> > >
> > > -Raffi
> > >
> > > At 09:15 AM 7/12/02 -0400, you wrote:
> > > >CIS-Motronic is like CIS-E, but with add-ons has some sort of
> Adaptive
> > > >Circuitry in the brain box.  Compensates for wear-and-tear, adverse
> > > >conditions, stuff like that.  It also has a fault memory for
> troubleshooting.
> > > >
> > > >Dan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>From: Euroroc II <flaatr@yahoo.com>
> > > >>To: scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > > >>Subject: CIS-E vs. CIS-Motronic
> > > >>Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:22:43 -0700
> > > >>
> > > >>What is the difference and advantage of one verses the other?
> > > >>
> > > >>-RGK-
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>_______________________________________________
> > > >>Scirocco-l mailing list
> > > >>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > > >>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_________________________________________________________________
> > > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > > >http://www.hotmail.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Scirocco-l mailing list
> > > >Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > > >http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Scirocco-l mailing list
> > > Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > > http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scirocco-l mailing list
> > Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l