Re: [cams]

["Aaron D. Patton" <apatton1@airmail.net>]

I can say from 1st hand experience that the G is a different cam from the
stock 1.6.  I have the 1.6 engine in my car still, and I am using a G-grind
cam.  If everything is working right, and it isn't very often these days, I
can rev smoothly to7000+ RPM with the G-grind.  Whereas with the stock 1.6
cam the engine would start to get wheezy (and where was George or Mr.
Bentley?) after 6k.  I had the Autotech tri-y and TT exhaust before I got
the cam, and it took the cam to really wake up my car.
Hope that made sense, it's far too early on a saturday morning for me.
ADP
:-) >
-----Original Message-----
From: pete&marcia <marpete@eskimo.com>
To: Brubaker, John <JBrubaker@AMF.com>
Cc: 'scirocco-l@privatei.com' <scirocco-l@privateI.com>
Date: Friday, January 09, 1998 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [cams]


>not even close to being correct......
> A G cam has more overlap, duration, lift, as well as less retard and a
>different lobe center.
>
>          Andy
>--
>To subscribe or unsubscribe, send email to scirocco-L-request@privateI.com,
>with your request (subscribe, unsubscribe) in the BODY of the message.
>

--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send email to scirocco-L-request@privateI.com,
with your request (subscribe, unsubscribe) in the BODY of the message.