Re: 2.0L (1.8 vs 2.0 head)

[brett@kodak.com (Brett VanSprewenburg)]

> 
> The way I understand it is that the smaller the port the higher the
> velocity for better low end torque. The bigger port would allow more
> volume at the expense of velocity but higher flow at higher rpm's.
>  Any other opinions?
>                 Andy
>              79 80 rocco's


Yes, perhaps my last email wasn't as clear as it could have been, but this
is the gist of what I was getting at. The 2.0 engine makes up for the lost
'low-end' flow with displacement. Maybe I should do an ascii art diagram of 
the flow graphs, would that help?

==Brett
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send email to scirocco-L-request@privateI.com,
with your request (subscribe, unsubscribe) in the BODY of the message.